Message Forum: Re: Wise man = Husband = HalfWitt

Re: Wise man = Husband = HalfWitt

Posted By: Wes, on host 204.215.203.55
Date: Friday, May 17, 2002, at 15:42:02
In Reply To: Re: Wise man = Husband = HalfWitt posted by Brunnen-G on Friday, May 17, 2002, at 15:05:58:

> Since Grishny's views are based on his religious beliefs, however, I'm not going to go into this further.

This happens an awful lot, and I'm really starting to wonder why. Why is it that any opinion is acceptable if it's based on religion while if someone had the same opinion for completely non-religious reasons everyone would be all over them for it? Is this religious equality running rampant? Or do you think that this is the way it should be, with people not needing to explain their opinions other than to say it's a religious thing? I'm really not trying to offend anyone, but this has been getting to me for a while now.

Replies To This Message

Re: Wise man = Husband = HalfWitt - Stephen - Fri, 5/17/2002, 16:29:28
- Re: Wise man = Husband = HalfWitt - Issachar - Fri, 5/17/2002, 20:47:58
- Re: Wise man = Husband = HalfWitt - Minamoon - Fri, 5/17/2002, 17:54:10
Re: Wise man = Husband = HalfWitt - Dave - Fri, 5/17/2002, 16:11:36
- Re: Wise man = Husband = HalfWitt - ria - Fri, 5/17/2002, 21:27:16
- Re: Interpretation - Issachar - Fri, 5/17/2002, 21:00:56
  - Re: Interpretation - Dave - Sat, 5/18/2002, 01:06:19
    - Re: Interpretation - gabby - Sat, 5/18/2002, 23:14:04
    - Re: Interpretation - Sam - Sat, 5/18/2002, 09:27:49
      - Re: Interpretation - Dave - Sat, 5/18/2002, 17:01:43
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Sat, 5/18/2002, 20:53:31
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Sun, 5/19/2002, 21:57:11
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Mon, 5/20/2002, 09:09:28
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Mon, 5/20/2002, 11:19:04
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Mon, 5/20/2002, 14:02:25
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Mon, 5/20/2002, 15:38:00
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Mon, 5/20/2002, 17:11:27
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Mon, 5/20/2002, 19:05:08
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Mon, 5/20/2002, 15:04:47
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Mon, 5/20/2002, 16:52:16
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Mon, 5/20/2002, 18:50:58
        
        Re: Interpretation - Don the Monkeyman - Wed, 5/22/2002, 22:43:45
        
        Re: Interpretation - Norton Fleeing - Thu, 5/23/2002, 00:17:11
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Thu, 5/23/2002, 09:18:50
        
        Re: Interpretation - Don the Monkeyman - Thu, 5/23/2002, 18:28:20
        
        Re: Interpretation - Frum - Fri, 5/24/2002, 00:14:12
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Thu, 5/23/2002, 19:43:26
        
        Re: Interpretation - Don the Monkeyman - Thu, 5/23/2002, 20:21:02
        
        Re: Interpretation - Mousie - Fri, 5/24/2002, 09:41:04
        
        Re: Interpretation - Don the Monkeyman - Sun, 5/26/2002, 12:10:08
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Thu, 5/23/2002, 23:17:48
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Thu, 5/23/2002, 07:46:20
        
        Re: Interpretation - uselessness - Sun, 5/19/2002, 16:49:02
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Sun, 5/19/2002, 23:11:06
        
        Re: Interpretation - Issachar - Tue, 5/21/2002, 14:44:41
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Wed, 5/22/2002, 09:53:22
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Wed, 5/22/2002, 13:55:59
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Wed, 5/22/2002, 15:43:11
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Wed, 5/22/2002, 15:57:39
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Wed, 5/22/2002, 18:47:10
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Wed, 5/22/2002, 19:27:54
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Wed, 5/22/2002, 18:10:52
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sosiqui - Wed, 5/22/2002, 19:12:31
        
        Re: Interpretation - ria - Wed, 5/22/2002, 17:21:14
        
        Re: Interpretation - wintermute - Wed, 5/22/2002, 17:34:09
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Wed, 5/22/2002, 18:26:07
        
        Re: Interpretation - wintermute - Thu, 5/23/2002, 03:18:27
        
        Re: Interpretation - Issachar - Wed, 5/22/2002, 10:09:49
        
        Re: Messianic Prophecy - Nyperold - Wed, 5/22/2002, 17:10:26
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Tue, 5/21/2002, 17:06:54
        
        Re: Interpretation - LaZorra - Wed, 5/22/2002, 10:47:29
        
        Re: Interpretation - Brunnen-G - Wed, 5/22/2002, 19:41:36
        
        Re: Interpretation - MissyClar - Wed, 5/22/2002, 15:20:15
        
        Amazing Grace - Mensekemeser - Wed, 5/22/2002, 12:27:24
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Wed, 5/22/2002, 08:39:28
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Wed, 5/22/2002, 14:47:09
        
        Re: Interpretation - Mousie - Thu, 5/23/2002, 09:55:34
        
        Re: Interpretation - wintermute - Wed, 5/22/2002, 09:12:31
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Wed, 5/22/2002, 10:07:09
        
        Re: Interpretation - wintermute - Wed, 5/22/2002, 17:25:11
        
        Re: Interpretation - Issachar - Wed, 5/22/2002, 10:18:42
        
        Re: Interpretation - Norton Fleeing - Tue, 5/21/2002, 23:49:53
        
        Re: Interpretation - Randy - Fri, 5/24/2002, 12:10:30
        
        Re: Interpretation - Ticia - Fri, 5/24/2002, 16:02:18
        
        Re: Interpretation - Ticia - Fri, 5/24/2002, 16:05:03
        
        Re: Interpretation - Stephen - Tue, 5/21/2002, 22:30:30
        
        Re: Interpretation - Frum - Wed, 5/22/2002, 10:01:07
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Wed, 5/22/2002, 18:47:12
        
        Re: Interpretation - Frum - Fri, 5/24/2002, 00:09:47
        
        Re: Interpretation - Don the Monkeyman - Thu, 5/23/2002, 18:39:59
        
        Re: Interpretation - koalamom - Thu, 5/23/2002, 13:07:09
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Sat, 5/18/2002, 21:21:10
        
        Re: Interpretation - Don the Monkeyman - Sun, 5/19/2002, 06:26:34
        
        Re: Interpretation - Minamoon - Sat, 5/18/2002, 18:17:07
        
        Re: Interpretation - Dave - Sat, 5/18/2002, 19:24:15
        
        Re: Interpretation - Minamoon - Sun, 5/19/2002, 08:43:02
        
        Re: Interpretation - Wes - Sat, 5/18/2002, 20:31:46
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Sat, 5/18/2002, 20:58:20
        
        Re: Interpretation - Minamoon - Sat, 5/18/2002, 17:58:57
      - Re: Interpretation - Wes - Sat, 5/18/2002, 13:18:56
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Sat, 5/18/2002, 14:14:57
        
        Re: Interpretation - Sam - Sat, 5/18/2002, 15:03:25
        
        Re: Interpretation - Wes - Sat, 5/18/2002, 14:43:39
    - Re: Interpretation - Dave - Sat, 5/18/2002, 02:13:04
      - Re: Interpretation - Sigi - Sat, 5/18/2002, 05:27:48

Post a Reply

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> > Since Grishny's views are based on his religious beliefs, however, I'm not going to go into this further. > > This happens an awful lot, and I'm really starting to wonder why. Why is it that any opinion is acceptable if it's based on religion while if someone had the same opinion for completely non-religious reasons everyone would be all over them for it? Is this religious equality running rampant? Or do you think that this is the way it should be, with people not needing to explain their opinions other than to say it's a religious thing? I'm really not trying to offend anyone, but this has been getting to me for a while now.
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Make sure you read our message forum policy before posting.