> Maybe I'm missing the mark, but it struck me as an odd reason to believe.

Maybe I should have said a little bit more with that but the line I was taking went along with the thoughts about people accepting or denying science based on where they stand. As stated in other posts, science can't prove or disprove God and, thus, it is not the basis for my viewpoint. But there are people who think that a scientific theory (such as evolution) is definite proof that there is no God. And, also using evolution, there are those who choose to reject the theory, and even science in general, because they feel it threatens their belief.

I'm saying, I don't see anything that says one way or another. This, despite hearing some well respected scientists on both sides make very good arguments about theories that might point one way or the other.

If I were to lean one way, though, I would say that I think science probably bolsters my belief because it makes sense and is orderly. I think this is in line with the way I understand God.

Ferrick