> Okay, now it's time to play "whodunit!" Ignoring completely when this message was posted (since that's too easy and is no fun at all :-}), it's time to determine who it really is!
>
> Notice the use of words such as "behaviour," "rumours," and "organisation" - all British spellings. These leads to two possible conclusions: either our culprit is European, or else he's me. The second one we can rule out, because... well, because I said so. So Sam's abductor - the spy from Katoo - must be a European, or at least have learned Engish in Britain.
>
> Furthermore, I would say that English is not the first language of the abductor. My tipoff here was the phrase "we need people as Sam;" this phrase, while technically, I believe, correct, is terribly archaic, and not one found in common use. Therefore, the possible conclusions are again twofold: our quarry is not a native speaker, or he is... well, me. And, again, I say he's not me.
>
> Yes, there can be only one conclusion reached here (well, okay, two, but I said it's *not* me). Based on the above evidence, I know who kidnapped Sam. A European. Someone whose first language is not English. The game is up, Katoo I, or should I say Issachar!

Duuuude. I'm living practically right on top of you (well, okay, only in the same state), not in Europa.....but of course you knew that and were just trying to antagonize me into submitting a new chapter of the "Brawl of the Nanosecond."

'Course, "Katoo I" IS a pretty stylin' name. I'll have to consider it a possible designation for my first-born. :-)

Iss "suo tno er asgnil h trae eh t-gni nraw" achar