Message Forum: Re: Bunk beds

Re: Bunk beds

Posted By: Travholt, on host 193.69.109.2
Date: Wednesday, November 7, 2001, at 08:42:43
In Reply To: Re: Bunk beds posted by Grishny on Tuesday, November 6, 2001, at 11:07:53:

> But I think that four posts is
> actually the minimum number required to
> support the top bunk.

Clearly, the solution to post economy is to build triangular bunks. The triangle is, as we all know, the most stable geometrical shape.

Trav"sleep bent"holt

Replies To This Message

Re: Bunk beds - Grishny - Wed, 11/7/2001, 08:50:43
- Re: Bunk beds - Lynette - Wed, 11/7/2001, 09:09:01
  - Re: Bunk beds - Grishny - Wed, 11/7/2001, 09:17:23
    - Re: Bunk beds - Brunnen-G - Wed, 11/7/2001, 17:45:28
      - Re: Bunk beds - Grishny - Wed, 11/7/2001, 20:15:44

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> > But I think that four posts is > > actually the minimum number required to > > support the top bunk. > > Clearly, the solution to post economy is to build triangular bunks. The triangle is, as we all know, the most stable geometrical shape. > > Trav"sleep bent"holt
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Replies To This Message

Post a Reply