> > Clearly, the solution to post economy is to
> build triangular bunks. The triangle is, as we
> all know, the most stable geometrical shape.
> >
> > Trav"sleep bent"holt
>
> That would be nice and innovative and
> cutting-edge and all, but I don't think current
> architectural designs would be very
> compatible with triangular bunks. For one
> thing, no one would buy them if they had to
> "sleep bent," so triangular bunks would have
> to be rather largish to solve that problem. But
> then, no one would buy them because where
> do you put them? No matter where you put
> one in a room, you'd have wasted space and
> sharp pointy bed corner projection to bang
> your extremities on. Result: enough lawsuits
> against Triangle Bed Company to put them
> out of business.

What if it were a right angle? it could fit in a corner then, although I guess it's not as stable, but it would fit, AND probably save space!

On the other hand, they would fit quite nicely in Mission.

Lyn"the dorm that most of the sophomores live in that was built in the 70s so is "riot-proof" (read: approximately 7 right angles in the ENTIRE BUILDING)"ette