Re: Forum poll: is romance better than honesty?
Dave, on host 208.234.219.180
Tuesday, June 12, 2001, at 16:49:53
Re: Forum poll: is romance better than honesty? posted by Sam on Monday, June 11, 2001, at 17:15:01:
> I was shocked at the number of people who leaned >toward #1 on this, but then I figured out why. >The ones leaning toward #1 mostly seemed to be >shying away from using the given examples of >little things -- saying "I love you" and "You >look beautiful" -- rather than little things in >general. > > Although my own reply also used these examples, >they were just that: examples. You don't EVER >have to say "I love you" or "You look beautiful" >for a relationship to be healthy. > > However, to be perfectly blunt, a relationship >that doesn't have multiple little things going on >every day is having problems. There are >countless "little things." A hug, a caress, a >wink -- write a note or an email for no reason, >draw funny faces on the eggs, sit extra close to >each other on the sofa. Whatever. ANY little >things. Essentially they are tailored to what >you know your partner appreciates. Ideally, but >not necessarily, they shouldn't even all be >conscious efforts but the natural consequence of >one's feelings. > > Relationships *need* several exchanges of >"little things" -- whatever they are, conscious or> not -- per day (on average) to survive. >Choice #1, so long as it is understood that the >specific "little things" mentioned in it are >examples only, is not an option for a healthy >relationship.
This from the guy who's wife complains that he spends all day sitting at the computer ignoring her.
;-)
-- Dave
|