> The whole idea of Screen-It is that you can figure out whether you WANT to see it and make an opinion for yourself. I have a hard time believing they outright lied.

Ok.

> It wouldn't be one of the most useful and reputable movie web sites in existence if they did. Their write-ups don't "make" anything "look like" anything -- they simply state for the record the potentially offensive material in the movie.

And lays it heavy with opinions. "Nightmarishly gory..." Right. I've had no bad dreams or feelings, or anyting of the like from that movie.

> "The Cell" has actually raised a lot of eyebrows and concern in general and is becoming the next major example of evidence for the need of an 'A' (adult) rating -- more restrictive than 'R' but without the stigma of 'NC-17' that makes studios prefer to crop an artistic vision than receive one.

Well, I never heard anything about that. And I don't see any real reason for a workable adult rating here. It's just surreal imagery.

> How come you even saw this movie?

Well, it looked kinda cool. This stuff isn't mentioned in the ads.

I'll say that the movie is surreal. I'll say it's gory, and probably will give little kids nightmares. 'Little Kids' is the term I'm using here. It won't give teenagers a fright; look at me. Adults will like it. It's a mind trip, but slightly more than that, so it's cool. I don't think a 'workable adult rating' should be put into practice, because the I wouldn't have been able to see this film.

Wormwood