Re: Olympics
Howard, on host 70.153.102.165
Wednesday, February 22, 2006, at 21:39:14
Re: Olympics posted by Gharlane on Wednesday, February 22, 2006, at 19:52:33:
> >Some events can be fixed. Ski jumping, for instance. Who ever thought "style" points for ski jumping was a good frickin idea? How about this? Build one massive frickin jump, and the guy who goes the farthest wins. That's it. You went 100m and your nearest competitor only went 95m? Congratulations, gold medal! I don't care if you looked like a wounded duck in the air, you win! > > > > That's my feelings, anyway. > > > > -- Dave > > > You know, come to think of it, I think that's why I prefer the Summer Olympics. Ski jump? If you go the furthest without turning into a giant snowball on your landing you should win. > > Any sport with "judging" is open to corruption; some moreso than others. I think fencing and equestrian events are more honest than figure skating and to a lesser degree, gymnastics and boxing. Indeed, most of the summer events are measured (check out those crazy pole-vaulters!). > > I could go on, but I think Dave summed it up pretty well. > > Gharlane
When they give style points for the 100 meter dash, and judges pick the winner in the hammer throw with no reguard to distance, the corruption will be complete. Howard
|