> read the original again and if you are still confused as to what was really trying to be conveyed, jump off of a tall building.

Oh, I'm not confused by that. Once I crawled through the grammatical barbed wire, your original argument was simple. However, since you are the one who introduced a tangent to the thread, I followed it. Notice how I even changed the subject to make it easy for you and other readers to know that the topic was changing.

What I wanted to know was where you got your information. I wasn't disagreeing with you. I have to have enough information in the first place if I want to honestly disagree. That's why I asked. What you said sounded wrong to me and by not supplying any data, it also sounded ignorant. You've obviously proved the last part your latest posts.

In another thread, you claim that someone called your opinion "tripe" because they disagreed with you?! Yet all you can do is insult people who might not agree with you or might be confused by what you write. Nice. This is a lazy way to argue and you are what you supposedly abhor.

I don't expect to get any worthwhile information from you to back up your claims other than hearsay and your opinion. Honestly, if you have it, I want to hear it.

If all you have are insults and mindless ramblings, bring it on. This board is always looking for a good laugh.

Ferrick