> > > Still, I would keep a Rogue instead of a fourth caster at low levels. Chests are pretty dangerous at that stage of the game, and Rogues can handle weapons and fend off attacks much better than casters.
> >
> > I only ever open chests with magic. I've killed too many rogues to take risks with them! Actually, wizards aren't that feeble and do fine at position 3 in a party. Fighters are at their least effective in the middling levels, and a fourth spellcaster has better offensive capability than any fighter. On my scheme, the sorceror turned assassin takes over at 3 around the time a wizard's offence capability disappears.
>
> Cross purposes again. When SP are abundant, I always use magic too.
>
> I would rather have an Assassin in the third spot than a caster, for the simple reason that I can always count on a high-level Assassin to kill one group of enemies in one turn. When enemies get really strong, there is no spell that you can count on to kill any enemy in one turn.
>
> I remember that in some of my longer games, I didn't bother attacking with my casters at all. It just wasn't worth it, because it took two turns to kill all the monsters anyway, and three Assassins could make short work of them in that amount of time without any help from the cheap seats.
>
> ^v^:)^v^
> FB

Hello: Could you please give me some tips on how to get my spell casters to have more spell points? When they reach another level they just get a few spell points added to the ones that they have. I don't think that any of them are lower than experience level 18. In fact there is a chance that they may be at level 19 or 20. My group already has one half of the Amulet. They killed the Leviathon. I think all three spell casters have less than 200 spell points each. Maybe after my spell casters have all the spells I will retrain them to be assassins. Thank you.