Re: The Long Now & Immortality
Eric Sleator, on host 68.7.40.26
Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 12:41:02
Re: The Long Now & Immortality posted by Shandar on Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 11:54:09:
> It brings to mind something I heard once or > twice growing up that I never confirmed to be > truth. Is it true that citizens of China are-- > or were at one time--restricted to having only > one child? I understand that population > control is a problem they face, but it seems > that number of offspring should not be > governmentally regulated. Perhaps the > particular type of freedom allowed in the > United States, which some other nations do not > enjoy, has tainted my objectivity a bit, but I > believe that the right to procreate is one of > those "inalienable rights" either "endowed by > our creator" or inherant to our existance, > depending on your belief system of course.
I don't think the Chinese government restricts families to one child, but it does promote the concept (in a biology book I had for a class there was a picture in the population section of a billboard in China with a picture of a smiling family on it and the words "IT IS BETTER TO ONLY HAVE ONE CHILD"). And, yeah, I think the right to procreation is inalienable. If anyone tried to ban me from ever having children, I'd have sixty just to spite them.
-Eric "And I'd give them all the same name for convenience" Sleator
|
Replies To This Message
Post a Reply