Main      Site Guide    
Message Forum
Re: Stephen's Background
Posted By: Paul A., on host 130.95.128.6
Date: Tuesday, August 24, 1999, at 18:50:46
In Reply To: Re: Stephen's Background posted by Stephen on Tuesday, August 24, 1999, at 18:27:41:

> > > Ste "Really hoping that Cameron still is involved with T3 and that the word that he's not is
> > > all a bunch of hooey" phen
> >
> > Personally, I'm hoping that the word that T3's being made is all a bunch of hooey.
> >
> > Look at the mess T2 made of things.
>
> What? Hardly. T2 was superior to the original in every way.

I don't know if you can say one was superior to the other. Superior at what? They were different kinds of movie. T1 was just a thriller about an innocent woman being stalked by an implacable killer; T2 was something else entirely.

> And if you're talking about the time travel plotline, come on, T1 wasn't exactly totally
> logical.

It was tidy, though. The entire thing was enclosed in a fixed loop that just went around and around and around and around.

Then in T2, they had to do something new, so they brought up the idea of changing the future. This suddenly makes things a lot messier - suppose they do manage to prevent Judgement Day: where did the three Terminators come from? Skylab never built them. And who was John's father? Obviously, he can't have been a member of the resistance, because there's no resistance and nothing to resist. Was he just some nut?

In T3, they're going to have to come up with something new again, and it'll probably make things worse.

Paul

Replies To This Message