Message Forum: Re: Disappointed at "I Think"

Re: Disappointed at "I Think"

Posted By: Sam, on host 24.61.194.240
Date: Friday, April 5, 2002, at 07:39:36
In Reply To: Disappointed at "I Think" posted by Sheepy on Friday, April 5, 2002, at 02:11:44:

> not only was the latest installment of "I think" just a cheap plug for "Murkon's Refuge", the latest one, #173, didn't have the words "I think" in it anywhere!

Shoot, you're right. Well, I amended #173 so it does, in fact, have "I think" in it. However, there are two (I *think* [!] it's two) others that don't, because I couldn't figure out how to work it in without throwing off the wording. Know what they are? ;-)

Replies To This Message

Re: Disappointed at "I Think" - Darien - Fri, 4/5/2002, 12:01:32
- Re: Disappointed at "I Think" - Sheepy - Fri, 4/12/2002, 23:48:02
  - Re: Disappointed at "I Think" - Sheepy - Fri, 4/12/2002, 23:53:57

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> > not only was the latest installment of "I think" just a cheap plug for "Murkon's Refuge", the latest one, #173, didn't have the words "I think" in it anywhere! > > Shoot, you're right. Well, I amended #173 so it does, in fact, have "I think" in it. However, there are two (I think [!] it's two) others that don't, because I couldn't figure out how to work it in without throwing off the wording. Know what they are? ;-)
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Replies To This Message

Post a Reply