Message Forum: Re: Disappointed at "I Think"

Re: Disappointed at "I Think"

Posted By: Sheepy, on host 203.45.24.200
Date: Friday, April 12, 2002, at 23:53:57
In Reply To: Re: Disappointed at "I Think" posted by Sheepy on Friday, April 12, 2002, at 23:48:02:

> > > > not only was the latest installment of "I think" just a cheap plug for "Murkon's Refuge", the latest one, #173, didn't have the words "I think" in it anywhere!
> > >
> > > Shoot, you're right. Well, I amended #173 so it does, in fact, have "I think" in it. However, there are two (I *think* [!] it's two) others that don't, because I couldn't figure out how to work it in without throwing off the wording. Know what they are? ;-)
> >
> > Well, #116 doesn't contain the phrase "I think," but it *does* contain "I would think." Does that count?
> oh great... you just HAD to tell me that didn't you?
> now I'm never going to be able to rest until I find them =p
#56, #116, and #169 don't have the phrase "I think"
ok, so I was bored =p

Post a Reply

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> > > > > not only was the latest installment of "I think" just a cheap plug for "Murkon's Refuge", the latest one, #173, didn't have the words "I think" in it anywhere! > > > > > > > > Shoot, you're right. Well, I amended #173 so it does, in fact, have "I think" in it. However, there are two (I think [!] it's two) others that don't, because I couldn't figure out how to work it in without throwing off the wording. Know what they are? ;-) > > > > > > Well, #116 doesn't contain the phrase "I think," but it does contain "I would think." Does that count? > > oh great... you just HAD to tell me that didn't you? > > now I'm never going to be able to rest until I find them =p > #56, #116, and #169 don't have the phrase "I think" > ok, so I was bored =p
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Make sure you read our message forum policy before posting.