Ah, I see. Yes, I've seen everything I've *rated*, but not reviewed everything I've rated.

> I realize now that you do *rate* every movie on
> At-A-Glance. Every movie listed has a star
> rating next to it. But apparently only some of
> the movies you've seen are either good
> enough or bad enough to deserve a written
> review.

It's not really a question of deserving so much as one of time. My ultimate goal for the site is to have every movie I've rated reviewed as well, but sometimes it's difficult to keep up with reviewing everything I've seen. Moreover, when I *started* At-A-Glance, I had over a thousand ratings and NO reviews. For a while I was churning out several reviews every single day just to populate the site with some actual reviews. Couldn't keep that pace up for long. Anyway, right from the beginning the task was not just to keep up with reviewing every movie I see but to catch up with reviewing the hundreds of movies I had seen previously.