> They have ratings. Anything I rate, I've seen.
>
> Or are you talking about movies that aren't
even given ratings, such as those found on
the actual review pages for series films like
the Charlie Chan flicks (which I've seen some
of but not all of)? Those are just there so
people can get information on related films;
they don't appear on the main At-A-Glance
index pages.

Okay, take this page for example. (linked to
below.) Many of the movies listed here are
hyperlinked to a review of that movie, written by
you. Many of them are not linked to a review.

I think I mistakenly assumed that you write up
a review of every movie you've seen, so
naturally I assumed that that if a movie did not
link to a review written by you, then you hadn't
seen it. So I wondered why there were so
many movies listed on At-A-Glance that did not
have reviews.

I realize now that you do *rate* every movie on
At-A-Glance. Every movie listed has a star
rating next to it. But apparently only some of
the movies you've seen are either good
enough or bad enough to deserve a written
review.

Gri"or am I mistaken again?"shny