Re: Pantsacola
Grishny, on host 12.29.132.98
Thursday, June 28, 2001, at 07:13:26
Re: Pantsacola posted by Brunnen-G on Thursday, June 28, 2001, at 01:23:41:
> > And then I heard that women were not > > allowed to wear pants on campus. Is that > > true? > > I hope not, otherwise Dave will be kicking > himself that he hadn't heard of this place > and wasted all those years going to the > University of New Hampshire instead. > > Brunnen-"yes, yes, I *do* know what you > meant...are there seriously places that can > DO that? Wow."G
Yes, it's true. And yes, Brunnen-G, there ARE seriously places that do that. Pensacola is one of them, along with many other conservative, fundamental Christian colleges such as Bob Jones University, Northland BBC, Ambassador BBC, Crown...to name a few. It's also true of any independent, fundamental church I've ever heard of. (I attend one.)
The women-shouldn't-wear-pants attitude seems to be very prevalent in the Fundamentalist movement, but I've never understood it. (How, pray tell, can a woman ride a horse, or go rock climbing, or do a slew of other similar types of activities, withOUT wearing them?) My wife also went to PCC; it's where we met. While she was there, she obeyed that rule, but she has absolutely no problem with wearing pants, shorts, or anything else as long as it's modest.
I have never heard a sermon preached from the Bible on why women shouldn't wear pants. I don't think you can support that position scripturally. I have heard messages on modesty, and certainly agree with that standard; it can be supported from the Bible. I don't know about the pants issue. I personally think it is one of those grey areas that boils down to personal conviction.
As for Pensacola, at times I wondered whether the reason behind some of their rules was a desire to project a certain image in the community. I remember while I was there often hearing the administration almost boasting about what a good rep the college had in the community. But more likely is the probability that the leadership there simply agrees with the Fundamentalist tradition.
Gri"wearer of pants"shny
|