Re: Forum poll: is romance better than honesty?
julian, on host 194.213.87.193
Monday, June 11, 2001, at 23:54:50
Re: Forum poll: is romance better than honesty? posted by Sam on Monday, June 11, 2001, at 17:15:01:
> Relationships *need* several exchanges of "little things" -- whatever they are, conscious or not -- per day (on average) to survive. Choice #1, so long as it is understood that the specific "little things" mentioned in it are examples only, is not an option for a healthy relationship.
First off, I agree, but I'm getting the feeling that people are reading the two viewpoints differently. I see where you get you interpretation from, but listen: "It's better to be honest and only do these things when the feeling genuinely strikes you that way". As I read viewpoint 1, this sentence embodies it. While I agree that a relationship cannot survive without "little things", whatever they may be, I actually feel the same about a relationship where conscious effort (to quote yourself) is necessary to bring about these gestures. This is my guess at why people are trying to combine the two viewpoints: Yes, honesty is paramount, even in the details, and Yes, "little things" on a regular basis are just as important.
Isn't it simply that the art of relationship is to combine the two? To find a partner with whom you have no trouble exchanging silly little love-tokens?
jul"but maybe I misunderstood everything"ian
|