Main      Site Guide    
Message Forum
Re: Labyrinth and Mary Poppins
Posted By: Wolfspirit, on host 64.229.200.191
Date: Tuesday, April 24, 2001, at 11:19:04
In Reply To: Re: Labyrinth and Mary Poppins posted by Mike, the penny-stamp man on Tuesday, April 24, 2001, at 07:49:17:

> Labyrinth, bad. Mary Poppins worse.
>
> Labyrinth, though enjoyable, is definitely a bad movie. The Escher staircase thing was great, as was "SMELL BAD!!!!!!!!1" And David Bowie's composition works well with it. Bowie's performance is what shot the movie for me, not as Goblin King, but as a musician: he doesn't sing more than a handful of notes that aren't out of tune.
>
> As for Mary Poppins, i haven't seen it in a few years. I just hated it as a child. Maybe now i'd appreciate it as an adult, but that one and Bedknobs and Broomsticks and Chitty-Chitty Bang-Bang were all just not in the right vein of silliness for my preferences. It was probably more timing than anything else.
>
> Penny*should probably watch it again, but not before i've finally located a copy of Eric the Viking first*stamp


Would you believe that I prefer Chitty-Chitty Bang-Bang over Labyrinth over Mary Poppins?!

The problem with all of these movies, for me, is the singing musicals. Argh. Where you say Dave Bowie's performance actually "made the movie" for ya, I'd say that's the exact same thing that tanked Labyrinth for me. Chitty-Chitty Bang-Bang is amusing only because the whole film is a very silly cute scenario requiring suitably silly antics. But I'm sorry, in general I just can't get my head wrapped around serious musicals, because it always breaks my suspension of disbelief.

I mean, c'mon, how many people would really attempt solving a gut-wrenching crisis by breaking out into a heartfelt digressive solo?

Wolfspirit

Replies To This Message