Just to warn you, if you're not familiar with Sam's article "How to be Romantic," you might want to brush up on it to make sense of this post.

I got to thinking about the posts by K and by other about K and it started to remind me of everything I learned about romance from the authoritative guide to romance: How to be Romantic, by Samuel Stoddard.

K is quite evidently not bright, which could possibly fit into the category of "Low Light" which everyone knows is romantic.

K has been embarrassed(or should be)by Sam at least once, and by others as well in this forum, which would make him red, if he still has the ability to blush. And the color red, of course, is yet another romantic characteristic. If he isn't red from embarrassment then his political views...uh...well I'l just leave that one alone.

Next, the letter K, when written in cursive, is one of the more curly letters of the alphabet. Romance in action, I'm tellin' ya.

His posts are certainly impractical for the most part. I have yet to see anything with a purpose or even thought provoking. Impracticality is HUGE in the world of romance.

The next big point for "K the hopless romantic" is personal stuff. According to Sam's post, K has been very interested in Sam's person stuff--namely, his personal information.

K has obviously spent a lot of time on his posts. For example"What do y'all think are the best lyrics you've heard?" must have taken at least 8 or 9 seconds. What self-sacrifice! How do you do it, K?

And last but not least(I'm purely speculating on this one, though), to my knowledge, K does not have food on his head. What a snoogly woogy shnookums bear!

Shan-Wuv...twue wuv-dar