Re: when you see this car, Howard, you'll have your answer. . .
Howard, on host 209.86.37.126
Tuesday, August 8, 2000, at 17:29:40
Re: when you see this car, Howard, you'll have your answer. . . posted by Faux Pas on Tuesday, August 8, 2000, at 09:28:59:
> > > I never thought a car could be uglier than the Pacer. > > Except for the location of the turn signals, I like the exterior (I like yellows and oranges). The interior -- jeez. How'd they actually build a car with not two, but four blind spots? Anyone look at the view through the rear window? It looks like the car was parked in front of two pillars. > > -Faux "haven't seen the commercials yet" Pas
I'm still watching for the commercial, too. Maybe they took it off the market. Is that thing supposed to be a SUV? My experience with SUV's is somewhat limited, but I have driven two of them. The Toyota 4Runner drives ok, somewhat like my pickup which is also a Toyota. But the second seat is miserably uncomfortable for anyone over 5 feet 2 inches tall. It has a little too much of a top-heavy feel for me. My truck will out corner it, even with the long wheelbase. I also drove a GMC Jimmy. Even the driver's seat was cramped. the visibility was worse than the Toyota and it was even more top-heavy. It had a jerky transmission and a noisy engine. The ride was choppy on all but the smoothest streets. SUV's are known for their roll-over tendency. Why in the world would somebody buy one of those dangerous, overpriced torture chambers? mi dos centavos Howard
|