Main      Site Guide    
Message Forum
Re: Syntactical Meanderings
Posted By: Howard, on host 205.184.139.46
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000, at 08:25:05
In Reply To: Re: Syntactical Meanderings posted by Brunnen-G on Wednesday, April 12, 2000, at 23:00:29:

> >I personally like the irregularity of English, and would use "dreamt" over "dreamed" anytime, or "yclept" over "cleped," or "dove" over "dived."
>
> I'd love to know in what context you've had the chance to use "yclept" in conversation. When I was at university I ended up thinking in Middle English half the time, especially around exams when I wasn't getting much sleep. I sometimes found myself using words and phrases in conversation that tended to make people think I was either insane or had just fallen out of a time warp somewhere. Maybe both.
>
> Brunnen-"I'm glad there isn't a syntax"G

I have never really figured out what syntax is.
I don't think it is a tax on sin, but that does sound like a good way to greatly increase the tax base.
The first time I ever got my hands on a prehistoric Apple II, it kept accusing me of syntax errors, but never told me what that was. Computers are like that. They always hold back the most important information. I guess you have to wring it out of them.
Syntax must have something to do with language, but if it's about computer language, I wouldn't understand it anyway. Syntax is xatnys spelled backwards, but that doesn't help much.
Howard

Replies To This Message