> I thought the test was quite biased and unfair myself (but then again, I kinda expected such from
> slate.com...) I bombed the reading comprehension (3 out of 5 right in 50 seconds),
> and apparently, *most* people did just as badly, judging from the posts on Slate's message board.

I got 4 out of 5 in 17 seconds, but the significance of that is a bit wobbly, because I'm still not sure what it was about.

If it hadn't been a speed test, I'd have read it slower.

Paul