Message Forum: Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006

Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006

Posted By: Sam, on host 64.140.215.100
Date: Friday, February 3, 2006, at 14:19:50
In Reply To: Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006 posted by Faux Pas on Thursday, February 2, 2006, at 16:30:52:

> I was pulling for Serenity and Sin City in the Visual Effects categories.

Serenity and Sin City lost that race last December when they failed to make the short list. It's true -- "Best" means "Most" in these tech categories.

Link: Best Visual Effects Short List

Replies To This Message

Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006 - Stephen - Fri, 2/3/2006, 14:50:52
- Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006 - Sam - Fri, 2/3/2006, 16:43:00
  - Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006 - Darien - Fri, 2/3/2006, 23:12:29
    - Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006 - Sam - Sat, 2/4/2006, 13:12:31
      - Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006 - Gharlane - Mon, 2/6/2006, 19:28:42
        
        Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006 - Nyperold - Wed, 2/8/2006, 10:25:35
        
        Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006 - Howard - Mon, 2/6/2006, 19:39:24
        
        Re: Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations 2005/2006 - Faux Pas - Wed, 2/8/2006, 11:24:59

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> > I was pulling for Serenity and Sin City in the Visual Effects categories. > > Serenity and Sin City lost that race last December when they failed to make the short list. It's true -- "Best" means "Most" in these tech categories.
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Replies To This Message

Post a Reply