> Your Honour, the record shows that Prosecution has shown bad faith by wilfully engaging in a false analogy between the species. Plaintiff's Counsel is clearly not an animal, neither bird nor beast. The question of animal rights does not apply: Counsel is a human being. It is trifling to consider blue tongues in humans as status quo. De minimis non curat lex. I ask the Court to fittingly reject Prosecution Counsel's argument.

Your Honour! New evidence! Witness the use of the phrase "De minimis non curat lex" in counsel's argument. Now, obviously, this phrase was used under the assumption that no one present could speak Sanskrit, because then we would understand the evil plot in action here! That prase tells us that counsel is actually Lex Luthor, out to destroy Rinkopolis! Where is Superman now?

Gridlock "Hah! I knew it all along!" Jones