Re: Movie Ratings
Ferrick, on host 169.237.131.64
Friday, July 9, 2004, at 08:58:08
Movie Ratings posted by uselessness on Friday, July 9, 2004, at 06:31:18:
Without a doubt, The Sting would be PG-13 today, a rating that didn't come into being until 1984 after Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, a movie with some fairly dark scenes, was given a PG rating. Red Dawn was the first movie released with a PG-13 rating. And what a thrill it was for me as a 12 year old to see it with my friend, also 12, with his parents in the movie next door.
Fer"They let us in!"rick
> I was under the impression that movie ratings were getting > more lenient over time... gradually more and more > "inappropriate" material seems to be slipping into films > with lower and lower ratings. I'm amazed at *how much* > they'll allow into a PG-13 movie these days. But perhaps I > was wrong in thinking that it's getting worse with time... > > When you think of films rated PG, what movies come to > mind? Probably kids' stuff. "Air Bud," "Stuart Little" and "Spy > Kids" were all rated PG. So was the 1973 heist movie "The > Sting." I just borrowed this movie from the library on DVD > and watched it for the first time two days ago. I was > expecting a light family-friendly comedy about bumbling > crooks, but that's not what I found, at all. > > "The Sting" is riddled with profanity, adult themes, alcohol > and tobacco use, and violence. I heard the S-word, "SOB," > and "n****r" all many times. Granted, the latter may have > been more acceptable in 1976 than it is today, and the > movie does take place in the 1930s. But I was still > surprised. There is also a scene of topless women dancing > on a stage (wearing pasties, but still)... It seems like > everywhere you look in the movie, someone is drinking like > a fish or smoking like a chimney. And there's plenty of > gunfire: three people are shot onscreen, two in the chest > (with blood all over their shirts) and one in the forehead (a > big bloody hole between her eyes). And finally, even if the > movie's content WAS suitable for children, the movie goes > at such a slow pace that most kids would likely be bored > out of their minds. > > So how does a film like this get the PG rating? Is this a sign > that the rating system has actually gotten stricter over the > years? If this movie came out today with that kind of rating, > I think a lot of people would be up in arms. What are your > thoughts on the matter? > > -useless"Has anyone here seen the movie?"ness
|