Re: what's "regular joes"
uselessness, on host 207.203.212.2
Tuesday, February 10, 2004, at 21:48:03
Re: what's "regular joes" posted by Platypi007 on Tuesday, February 10, 2004, at 19:31:55:
> Worked REALLY hard to support his 11 kids, his wife, and the family dog; thus the need for the dozen boxes of cereal.
Well, y'know, times were different in those days. They didn't have none of those "Froot Loops" or "Lucky Charms" back then. No sir, all they had were "shredded pine bark" and the occasional bowl of "hay with berries." Breakfast foods as we know them were still a long way off, and with the war effort underway, there were no inexpensive alternatives. Many people simply skipped the meal in those days. The traditionalists, however, settled for whatever they could get, thankful that the decreased demand had lowered cereal prices (most grocers had to PAY people to eat the stuff). Thus, it wasn't uncommon for households like the Average family to purchase cereal in bulk, to take advantage of the low prices while they were still in effect. After all, the landscape of cereal variety would change drastically in the next three years, culminating with the advent of "corn flakes," which marked the dawn of a new era -- a time when breakfasts had become so enjoyable that the public was desensitized to the perils of eating food that doesn't use torture as a means of contributing to one's character.
-useless"glad I stayed awake in that economics class"ness
|