Re: Holiday/Oscar Movies, 2003
Sam, on host 24.62.250.124
Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 17:19:20
Re: Holiday/Oscar Movies, 2003 posted by Brent on Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 14:52:14:
> > Er. He wasn't saying being from a minor studio makes it bad. He was saying you probably won't be able to find it until it hits DVD. Please do not succumb to prejudice when reading a statement and choosing to interpret it as if it was made up of completely different words. > > If you read the paragraph, it oozes negative kharma.
Dude, the only oozing happening here is crap, to this forum. You can't just read a vibe in an Internet post and swear by it against all logic and objections of those who know me better. As it happens, I *am* quite looking forward to the movie, as it is exactly the kind of thing I frequently enjoy. So no, there isn't any negative kharma going on except what you made up.
> I will give you an example of what he could have said if all he was implying is that it would be hard to get: > > This movie, although a promising start by a new movie studio, will probably be hard to find even on DVD.
No, that's what I would have said if I had seen the movie already and enjoyed it. Or it's what I would have said if I were so paranoid of offending someone such as yourself by making a comment of some kind that isn't umambiguously enthusiastic.
I have not seen the movie. I don't know if it's a "promising start" by a minor studio or not. I don't know if it's even going to be any good at all. That does not, however, mean I am not more or less looking forward to seeing it.
> When I read a statement, I either find it positive or negative. His statement was most definitely on the negative side.
You might want to consider that sometimes -- arguably more often than not -- reality falls somewhere in between extremes.
|