> > I don't really have anything to say about deism or religion in general or the quotation in question. However, I would like to make a comment about fear, as it is currently understood. I think fear is one of the most valuable "emotions" one can possess. However, in our society it seems that fear has been trivialized to the point that, far too often, one who possesses it for reasons other than recreation is looked down upon as weak or squeamish. However, we have a fear response for a reason. Fear is a defense mechanism. To cite the previous example, one would be afraid of a rapist because they pose a threat of physical harm. The fear response is there to warn us of impending danger, and to cause us to react as quickly as possible. Fear is good. Now, that is not to say that those things of which one may be afraid are not scarring. Certainly, should a woman not be able to overcome the attack of a rapist, she would suffer emotional and physical scarring. However, her fear response is in place, not to cause her harm, but to prevent it if possible. Had there been no fear of the man or the situation it could have made it easier for the attack to be successful. Which is why we think of people putting themselves in harms way without reason as stupid, not brave. In short, although the cause of fear may not be, fear itself is a good thing.
> >
> > Shan-how this relates to the previous topic, I don't know-dar
>
> I don't think anyone would or is arguing that fear is isn't valuable as a necessary survival tool. I believe the issue at hand is (or was, if things have been cleared up) whether fear and love are equally preferable as something consciously being caused in someone, whether by a human being or by God.
>
> James

I understood the issue at hand. I wasn't arguing fear versus love. I was arguing that fear in and of itself isn't "a terrible and scarring thing". Things that cause fear are often terrible and scarring. But fear itself is good--vital, even.