>Might as well throw the book at the guy, unless he can explain how his DNA was found on the body of a baby that had yet to be given birth to. >Also, I'm sure it was more than a coincidence that the bodies were found close to the same spot where Scott Peterson was fishing the day before Laci's disapperance...miles and miles from their home.

Would you throw the book at Richard Jewell? Or how about the Smart family? They were the first suspects in the Elizabeth Smart abduction. There are people in prison now who were convicted on better evidence than they have on Peterson, and some of them are innocent. DNA testing has cleared several already. He may be guilty as sin, but I am willing to wait for a jury to make that accessment.

I heard a guy say that if he had been on the O.J. Simpson jury, old O.J. would be in the cooler right now, because there was so much evidence against him. I didn't bother to mention that one vote out of 12 won't convict, but I did mention that if I had been on his jury, I would have voted just as they did, because there was so much *tainted* evidence against him. I still suspect that he did it, but when there is evidence of a frame-up, juries are correct in voting for acquital.