> The problem you're going to run into, though, is that it's logically impossible to prove me wrong about what the purpose of life is if I insist there is no purpose. Relativism is logically consistent and cannot be disproven (since relativists can deny the inherent truthfulness of the assumptions logic makes it's hard to use logic against). I'm not a relativist, usually, but since I'm denying any objective sort of purpose to life I might as well be for this discussion.


The word "impossible" always catches my eye.

My question is this: If I could logically prove the existance of a creator would it still be impossible to disprove the notion that life has no purpose?

Shan-I don't like impossibilities-dar.