>
> On a side note - Windows 2000 is going to require 128mb of RAM? That's not just rediculous, that's obscene. Alternative OS time, anybody?
>

It is? You mean to tell me that Windows, a 2d GUI that should be the most efficient thing on my computer, is going to require more RAM than Half-Life or Quake 3? This thing had better have some sweet graphics or weapons or something, or else I'm gonna be pissed. I've only got 64 MB of RAM and that does everything I need it to fine (and I play all the latest games... the only one that I've played that doesn't run well is Kingpin, but that doesn't seem to run well ANYWHERE).

I don't think I will be buying Win 2000 (Well, I didn't exactly pay for 98 either). One of these days it would be nice to just get rid of the Windows partition on my computer entirely. Hopefully by the time 2000 becomes needed to run the new stuff I'll also be able to use Linux for everything I'd want...

Stephen