Message Forum: Re: A portentous patent

Re: A portentous patent

Posted By: Quartz, on host 66.147.196.219
Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 22:52:49
In Reply To: A portentous patent posted by Issachar on Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 07:48:31:

> Try not to drool as your brain performs the contortions of logic necessary to understand how the Patent Office deemed a method of swinging on a swing to be a patent-worthy innovation.
>
> Iss "if only I had *proof* of prior art!" achar

What interests me even more is how and why you found and looked around the United States Patent Office's website in the first place.

Qua "It sounds pretty dull" rtz

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> > Try not to drool as your brain performs the contortions of logic necessary to understand how the Patent Office deemed a method of swinging on a swing to be a patent-worthy innovation. > > > > Iss "if only I had proof of prior art!" achar > > What interests me even more is how and why you found and looked around the United States Patent Office's website in the first place. > > Qua "It sounds pretty dull" rtz
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Post a Reply