> > Liz"now if a bag of warm milk was an option, there would be NO contest"zie
> > x
>
> The question being Which of these would you *least* like to eat, here's how it broke down for me, in order from most repugnant to less:
>
> 1) Hell. Best know as a place of torment, part by flame and part by memory. Eating it, even just enough to fill a bag, would kill me, and be tortuous besides.
>
> 2) Death. Less revolting than Hell to eat, as the death might not be painful. But still, eating it would, as above, be suicide. Not an option for me.
>
> 3) Your(my)self. Cannibalism isn't my thing, especially self-cannibalism. Ew. I suppose if I could eat a small bag, such that I could recover from the loss, I might be able to.
>
> 4) Spit. Ew. Just... Ew.
>
> 5) Stupidity. Assuming this would make me stupid. Otherwise, switch with 6.
>
> 6) Shut up. I don't talk much anyway, and I suppose I could write or type if I had to communicate. I'd eat this bag if I had to eat one of these.
>
> Nyper"Bag End"old

I agree, Nyperold. Eating a bag of Hell would be FAR worse than a bag of spit. Yes, spit is gross, but you would at least SURVIVE the ordeal.

The_Scots"Could always use sign language for a bag of shut up, too"man