Message Forum: Re: "Reverse discrimination"

Re: "Reverse discrimination"

Posted By: Balanthalus, on host 207.172.11.150
Date: Monday, December 17, 2001, at 09:41:19
In Reply To: Re: "Reverse discrimination" posted by Bo on Sunday, December 16, 2001, at 19:13:36:

Hmm. I'm not sure what "PC" used to mean, but now it's pretty much used as a catch-all for a statement one doesn't agree with, usually one considered beneath debate.

Bal"One good link deserves another"anthalus

Link: How to argue

Replies To This Message

Re: "Reverse discrimination" - Eric Sleator - Mon, 12/17/2001, 22:47:25
Re: "Reverse discrimination" - 10Kan - Mon, 12/17/2001, 13:06:36
- Re: "Reverse discrimination" - Bo - Mon, 12/17/2001, 14:46:08
  - Re: "Reverse discrimination" - 10Kan - Mon, 12/17/2001, 14:57:43

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> Hmm. I'm not sure what "PC" used to mean, but now it's pretty much used as a catch-all for a statement one doesn't agree with, usually one considered beneath debate. > > Bal"One good link deserves another"anthalus
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Replies To This Message

Post a Reply