> What do we do with ones where multiple answers apply to us? I was generally able to decide which of multiple answers applied to me, but I'm sure I'm not the only one with a little bit of trouble with that.
>
> Also, for the "T" variable, I liked it better the way you used to have it way back, uh, three hours ago where it was the same as the others isntead of in date format. I don't know what the first time I came to RinkWorks was, but I know that it was within the first couple of months before my first RinkForum post (which I can date). Thus, I can say whether it was in the 2-3 years range or the 4-5 years range, but I couldn't put it in a date format because I don't know even what months it was in.
>
> Also, with the AGL one, there's no answer that fits with me. I've started most of them, but I never finished them. However, I don't believe I'd ever asked anyone for help with any of them, either, which would rule out what I'd otherwise put, which has a "spoon-fed answers" clause. As Big Brother put it, "doubleplusungood - rectify".
>
> -Eric "F++++ C+++++ W++ AGL(X) P++++ D+ T++++" Sleator
> Sun 4 Nov A.D. 2001

Ah. I've updated the file and it now acommodates both of your requests. You can use T(3-4) or a variant for time. And I have better wording in the AGL category. You're AGL-.

And the best part is this doesn't affect anyone else's code.

Silon