> > There's this thing called "scientific evidence", you see...
>
> The scientific "evidence" of evolution is flimsy at best, to the point where many don't believe that any more either, yet don't want to embrace the only viable alternative either. But let's not go down this road, as I've never seen a debate of this nature do any good for anyone on either side. Suffice it to say that there is more than one plausible side to the issue.

The Big Bang theory has been disproved, evolution has been disproved, they are both THEORIES anyway, and yet schools continue to teach them as fact. The only teacher I know of who didn't teach them as fact kept saying "Now, this is only a theory." Actually, Darwin himself said that evolution would be disproven if you could find one thing that could not have evolved naturally. Let me give you some examples: blood clotting (it either has 23 or 32 steps, I can't remember which). Complex eyes. Human intelligence. This last one, expecially. We couldn't have got brains and thought like this without being created like it.

-Morris Cecil "OK, maybe I don't have as much intelligence as SOME people, but I most certainly did not evolve from an ape" Glalet, Tue 20 Jul A.D. 1999