Re: A Question of Royalty
julian, on host 194.213.87.193
Friday, October 12, 2001, at 03:38:48
Re: A Question of Royalty posted by wintermute on Friday, October 12, 2001, at 01:33:39:
> > > > The autocracy [translation?]... > > Autocracy: Any form of government ruled by a single person. Perfectly valid, but "Monarchy" would be better. >
Come to think of it, "Monarchic autocracy" would be the ultimate nitpicking term, since the monarchy referred to is the one that actually *did* have absolute power, in contrast to the monarchy of today.
> > ...gave the order new regulations [tr?] > > "Rule" (both singular and plural) is the common form for knightly orders, dating to the Rule of the Templars, a 700-point document forbidding the Templars from (among other things) playing chess or bathing more than one a week. >
Ah, yes. It's funny how things coincide: Just this lunch break, the topic of chess as an activity for masculine (historically, you understand :) ), power-broking types of people came up in a discussion. Think cigars, malt whiskey, oak panels on the walls of the library, playing for supremacy. Hmf.
> winter"This *is* a fun topic :)"mute
... and it may be about to diverge!
jul"you may make of that whatever you like"ian
|