Message Forum: Re: A Question of Royalty

Re: A Question of Royalty

Posted By: wintermute, on host 195.153.64.90
Date: Friday, October 12, 2001, at 01:16:23
In Reply To: Re: A Question of Royalty posted by Dave on Thursday, October 11, 2001, at 19:10:07:

> > And besides, anyone who can intimidate the US
> >President into declaring war after he's insisted
> >that it won't happen deserves a little respect.
>
> Uh, wait. When did this happen?
>
> -- Dave

1991. President Bush was dead set against getting involved in the Iraq / Kuwait conflict, until a state visit by Thatcher (who was strongly in favour of both Britain and the US getting involved), when he changed his mind.

winter"Or so my sources tell me. Not neccessarily gospel, though"mute

Replies To This Message

Re: A Question of Royalty - Faux Pas - Fri, 10/12/2001, 08:12:57
- Re: A Question of Royalty - wintermute - Fri, 10/12/2001, 08:25:32
  - Re: A Question of Royalty - Darien - Fri, 10/12/2001, 21:45:15
    - Re: A Question of Royalty - wintermute - Mon, 10/15/2001, 01:10:39
      - Re: A Question of Royalty - Darien - Mon, 10/15/2001, 05:50:15
        
        Re: A Question of Royalty - Dave - Mon, 10/15/2001, 15:20:28

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> > > And besides, anyone who can intimidate the US > > >President into declaring war after he's insisted > > >that it won't happen deserves a little respect. > > > > Uh, wait. When did this happen? > > > > -- Dave > > 1991. President Bush was dead set against getting involved in the Iraq / Kuwait conflict, until a state visit by Thatcher (who was strongly in favour of both Britain and the US getting involved), when he changed his mind. > > winter"Or so my sources tell me. Not neccessarily gospel, though"mute
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Replies To This Message

Post a Reply