Re: The Bets Game Evar (except for the blood)
Grishny, on host 12.29.132.98
Thursday, August 30, 2001, at 13:28:00
Re: The Bets Game Evar (except for the blood) posted by Philbee on Thursday, August 30, 2001, at 12:43:42:
> Ummm...I appreciate that I don't understand the niceties of baseball, being english, but how can it be the "Bets Game Evar" when nothing happens? I mean, football (soccer, for any and all americans out there) matches often go to 0-0 draws, but then I don't find many of them interesting. Cricket is even more boring, but at least things happen in every over. I've probably got the wrong end of the stick here, but why is it that people will sit down and watch very boring stuff, and pay to do so?
Heh. First of all, you must understand that I personally have never paid to attend a professional sporting event of any kind! Hard to believe, perhaps, but true. We got the tickets to this particular game free from my father's place of employment.
Second of all, surely by now you've realized that the phrase "BETS GAME EVAR" and it's many variations have become something of a cliched catch-phrase around here. My usage of that title was mainly facetious. I don't really think that Monday nights game was the best one ever. It was pretty dang exciting at the end, though.
Thirdly, Monkeyman made a good point-- even when no runs are being scored, interesting and exciting events are still taking place on the field. I suppose my saying "nothing happened" was another bit of facetiousness on my part, since actually, there was quite a bit going on, both on and off the field.
Hope that answers your question!
Gri"the real question: why do we pay outrageous prices for mediocre food and drink at said professional sporting events?"shny
|