Re: The K-cut Sandwich
Don the Monkeyman, on host 24.70.0.3
Wednesday, August 29, 2001, at 10:46:01
Re: The K-cut Sandwich posted by Don the Monkeyman on Wednesday, August 29, 2001, at 10:09:25:
> Don "OK, I may not get to it this afternoon. My next meal will be a sandwich, though, and it will be K-cut" Monkey
OK, I stopped OATing to try this sandwich.
First, I got the butt end of the bread, and it was the only bread in the house, so I lost out on the crustless goodness right away. Also, my lettuce is running out, so I had two small leaves instead of one big one, and they did not stay on the narrow slice very well. Third, I got the first slice of tomato, which is thicker, but with a smaller diameter, so it didn't stay well in the sandwich either.
Despite all these problems with the sandwich, the merits of the K-Cut shone through beautifully. I ate the pieces in the same order as Grishny, and the first piece was a nice departure. It was smaller than my pieces usually are, and thus easier to grip. It felt a bit better than usual in my mouth. This piece did not have any tomato, though, because of its distance from the center of the sandwich.
The next two pieces were like the first--too much crust, of course, but still good. The fourth piece (the triangle in the middle from the right hand side) was DIVINE. It had a good portion of tomato, lots of cheese, and it held together beautifully.
The last piece was a bit of a disappointment--the very thick slice of tomato and the bump on the lettuce made it very hard to hold together, being so narrow. Also, the butt bread guaranteed a large amount of crust. Still, I was amazed to find that the cheese (despite being s low-fat Kraft Single Slice) tasted much better than I can ever remember it tasting. That fact stands out to me as a clear sign of the absolute superiority of the K-Cut.
I give the sandwich four stars out of five, and five out of five if the bread/tomato/lettuce problems are taken into consideration and ignored as deviations from the norm.
Don Monkey
|