Re: speaking about ounces ...
wintermute, on host 195.153.64.90
Wednesday, June 27, 2001, at 02:59:48
speaking about ounzes ... posted by Stephan on Wednesday, June 27, 2001, at 02:43:42:
> Hail Thee,
Hail, and verily :)
> > I don't know why Americans felt the need to reduce the size of a pint (and therefore a gallon) > > but no doubt they had a good reason. > > Yeah, like trying to rip off customers on a per pint basis :) > > But I see that I found an expert. Good ! There is one question that I have been pondering for some time now. In fact ever since I first read the myterious legend "floz" on bottles of perfume. Growing up meant I got (relatively speaking here) smarter. So nowadays I know that 1 floz is in fact 1 fluid ounce. But what the heck is that ? Why is there a need to have ounzes for fluids and (supposedly) other ounces for non fluid stuff ?
Expert? No, I just grew up using these measures more often than Napolean's metric system.
1 fluid ounce is the volume of water that weighs 1 ounce. Basically, the difference is that a fluid ounce is volume, a dry ounce is weight.
> Side issues for the really smart: > 2) Why is "ounce" abbreviated "oz" ? (which always reminded me of The Wizard of Oz anyway)
It's because of the old apothocary's* symbol which always looked like a "3" to me, but is apparantly a lower case z. Of course, I don't know why they used that symbol, so it doesn't really answer your question. Probably something from Latin. Also, "oz" and "ounce" sound a bit alike (Not much, I know) so that might be part of the reason.
Anyway, I would like to close by saying that imperial measures rock.
winter"chains, minims, perches, kilderkins, furlongs, acres..."mute
*The word "apothocary" is so much cooler than "chemist", don't you think?
|