Re: The Hunchback of Notre Dame (slight spoiler)
Paul A., on host 130.95.128.51
Friday, April 27, 2001, at 04:53:15
Re: The Hunchback of Notre Dame (slight spoiler) posted by Don the Monkeyman on Thursday, April 26, 2001, at 22:50:09:
> > This post reminded me of a time, a while ago, when I was thinking about movie adaptations that > > didn't stick to the stories they were adapted from. At the time, it seemed to me[1] that the > > best unfaithful movie adaptations -- the ones that weren't much like the book, but were great > > movies in their own right -- have been the ones that *aren't* named after the book that > > inspired them. > > > > _Blade Runner_ being an obvious example.
> > [1] I'm sure, now that I've said it, that someone will come up with a counterexample. > > Just to give you your wish, I'll do my best: Shawshank Redemption.
In my opinion, _The Shawshank Redemption_ doesn't qualify as an unfaithful adaptation, so I'm not sure how it proves anything.
Pa"great story, though"ul
|