> hrm, my attempt at quoting the previous message didn't work too well. Oh, well. Ignore the superfluous >'s in that message.

That's the way you want it. The >'s indicate what was spoken by the person you're replying to, to differetiate it from what you're saying. Your reply to Grishny, in which you yanked the > symbols out, is harder to read.

S "Welcome to RinkWorks!" am