Re: The [censored]ness of some absolute [censored]s
Brunnen-G, on host 203.96.111.201
Tuesday, December 5, 2000, at 12:10:55
Re: The [censored]ness of some absolute [censored]s posted by Faux Pas on Tuesday, December 5, 2000, at 07:05:32:
> Totally unrelated comment ahead. > > I can't figure out what would've been the naughty bit in the subject line's "[censored]ness". None of the curse words I know would actually fit in that context. Sure, I know several that would fit the "[censored]s", but that's because I watch television shows and movies that feature exploding cars and people with guns. > > -Faux "a curious little [censored]" Pas
I don't know either. By not putting a word there, I was hoping people would think of it as some phrase so appalling they've never even heard it before, and nobody else is willing to tell them.
What a fine message forum this is. People even manage to find language-usage errors in words which weren't even *in* the sentence. It could only happen at Rinkworks. :-)
|