> > > The term "RinkWorks staff" is not one I like, and I may change it when I get the notion and a
> > > better idea, but in short it has no immutable definition -- it's just a general hand-waving
> > > "us." Your perceptions about what's really going on behind RinkWorks are still correct.
> >
> >
> > Seriously, "RinkWorks Staff" just makes it sound professional. So what if it's essentially a staff of one? If a person can be "President and CEO" of a company of two people, why can't you be pretty much the sole member of "RinkWorks Staff"?
> >

> How about "Rinkworks cast" or "Rinkworks production crew?" No? I guess those sound too theatrical. Maybe "Rinkworks editoral assistants." Cohorts? Conspirators? Gang? No, I've got it! "The Rinkworks Force."
> Howard

I suggest that the most professional-sounding and least silly titles might be:

/ / / / / "RinkWorks Associates & Cooperatives," (or vice versa), or

/ / / / / "RinkWorks Cohorts & Associates,"

or just the simple and friendly:

/ / / / / "RinkWorks Folks & Friends,"

with Sam listed as the CEO, that is, the "Chief Executive-Energizing Officer".


Wolf "'Hello! You have reached the official Rink WebResidence of Sam, Samuel, Stoddard, and Leen and Dave'" spirit