> I disagree. It wasn't THAT bad. Sure, there was some bad acting and the music sucked. However, if you just take the movie for what it is without comparing it to the first movie, it's not bad. IMHO, there were more tense moments and more fright than the first movie. This felt like much more of a horror movie than the first one.
>
> The 3rd one should be out by next fall.

First of all.. how is it that we both returned on the same day? Weird....

Secondly, I respect your opinion, but I didn't compare it to the first one because there was nothing for me to do a comparison with. Like I said, this one had hardly anything to do with the first movie. I do agree that there were more intense moments in this movie. But I'm not so sure I ever felt any fright. The first one was still more scary and all-out spooky because it didn't really freak you out during the movie, but after the movie I was spooked for weeks. I still have heart-pounding experiences when I'm in the woods.

But hey, everyone has their own opinions. Thanks for giving the other side of the story. :)

famous