> The reader reviews section on "It's a Bad, Bad, Bad, Bad Movie" seems to be a good thing all around. The feedback about it has been good, and a lot of interesting opinions have been expressed because of it. The word I'm receiving is that you like having the fairly high update rate for new material, and you also like that reviews aren't immediately posted after submission -- so that we can do some quality control before the reviews hit the pages. It's a win for me, too, because *I* get new and interesting things to read, plus I can provide new RinkWorks content fairly efficiently and without detracting my attention from the other areas.
>
> So my question is this: what other types of reader-interactive features would you like to see on RinkWorks? The same sort of thing as the IABBBBM reader reviews could be implemented on other sites -- if so, WHAT sites? -- or there might be other types of interaction you folks might like to be able to have. Right from the beginning people were telling me they liked the "community" nature of RinkWorks, and I was pleased because that type of site sounds exactly like the one I want to have. The way I see it, these types of things only enhance that. I will, however, put the brake on perhaps the most obvious suggestion: no, there won't be a "reader condensation" section on BAM/MAM. But let me hear any other ideas that spring to mind. :-)

Good call. There's not much one can do to improve on that. :)

How about Computer Stupidities/Things People Said? (Please, NOT "I Think"... it would most likely be far below the existing standards). Basically, people can post things they've done or heard about that are just so incredibly stupid, that only a daytime talk show host moonlighting as a tabloid editor could replicate the situation. :)

Also... have you ever considered going into the Urban Legend debunking biz, too? That gets pretty danged interactive.

Di "Tee Hee" ane