Main      Site Guide    
Message Forum
Re: Anti-aliased Graphics
Posted By: Grishny, on host 207.90.113.68
Date: Sunday, June 18, 2000, at 14:44:10
In Reply To: Re: Anti-aliased Graphics posted by Travholt on Sunday, June 18, 2000, at 09:46:30:

> > You know, I used to think that too, but now I think it
> just wouldn't be right. We don't need no stinking
> graphics! We are coming here to be entertained and
> mentally stimulated, not to be awed by flashy graphical
> titles.
>
> That's true--but I don't come here to be annoyed by
> jagged-edged titles, either... :-)
>
> It doesn't matter that much, but to me, it reeks of
> graphics made at least 10 years back... I get a feeling
> that this site is made by "amateurs" and hasn't been
> updated at least for half a decade or so. And I know it's
> not like that, so the feeling I get from the graphics
> doesn't fit reality. (I hope this is taken as a compliment
> about the contents of this place...)
>
> The reason why I even bother to say anything about
> this, is that I am a graphic designer, and thus care
> about both the wrapping and the contents, because
> the wrapping also is a part of the package, in fact it's
> the first thing the recipient will notice.
>
> Trav"finished story 1, now on a quest for a clue on
> 2.2"holt.

Surprise surprise! I am a graphic designer too! And I just feel that this is one site that doesn't *need* flashy, anti-aliased graphics to attract or keep an audience. Sam doesn't want just anybody and everybody here. I feel like the kind of people who Sam wants to enjoy this site aren't going to make the decision to stay or return based on the graphics anyway, but on the content. From what I have seen, most of the folks here, myself included, found out about RinkWorks by word of mouth.

Gri"of course MY site is going to have flashy graphics. I need them, 'cause I'm nowhere *near* as cool as the Sam-Man"shny