Re: trolls?
Howard, on host 205.184.139.45
Tuesday, May 30, 2000, at 12:32:31
Re: trolls in general posted by Faux Pas on Tuesday, May 30, 2000, at 07:06:06:
> > Sigh... > > > > If he comes back, he'll only do this more, because now you've shown him that this stuff gets to you. > > Yes, trolls do annoy me in much the same way that mosquitoes to (good imagery, BG). However, if he does come back to this message forum, he'll see a thread that calls him a loser rather than the third or fourth response to that thread. That is what would tempt him to repost his inanities. > > I would have rather fought the troll with the only weapon that seems to affect them: silence. But as another member of our community started a thread about the troll (which was a rather well-written piece, Wolfspirit), I felt that it was okay to post what I did: > > 1. Trolling posts will be deleted. > 2. Trolls are anti-social immature cowards. > 3. Trolls will be ignored. > > And that's all I'll be saying about this. > > -Faux "on to better posts" Pas
Somebody told me that trolls were people who read the posts, but don't post anything. If that is correct, they shouldn't be a problem. I think I heard that on RinkWorks. Is there another definition? Howard
|